Peer-review Policy

Selecting the right peer reviewers is crucial to ensure the quality and integrity of the publication process. At GALLA, we consider several factors when choosing peer reviewers, including their expertise, reputation, specific recommendations, potential conflicts of interest, and previous performance. We prioritize reviewers who demonstrate speed, thoroughness, sound reasoning, and collegiality.

Editor Responsibilities:

• Editors are responsible for securing a minimum of two peer reviewers for manuscripts reporting primary research or secondary analysis of primary research. In exceptional circumstances, such as niche or emerging fields, it may not always be possible to obtain two independent reviewers. In such cases, editors may make a decision based on one peer review report, ensuring it meets the required standards outlined below.
• Peer review reports should be in English and provide constructive evaluations of the authors' work, specifically regarding the appropriateness of methods, accuracy of results, and support for conclusions. Editorial decisions should be based on peer reviewer comments that meet these criteria, rather than on short, superficial reports lacking a rationale.
• Editors are responsible for independently verifying the contact details of suggested reviewers, and should use institutional email addresses whenever possible. Each manuscript should be reviewed by at least one reviewer not suggested by the author.

In rare instances when two independent peer reviewers cannot be secured, the Editor may act as a second reviewer or make a decision based on a single report. In such cases, the Editor must have sufficient knowledge in the subject matter, sign the review for transparency, and ensure that the report is detailed and thorough. Additionally, the first reviewer should be a senior expert who has recently published on the subject.

Authors are advised not to recommend recent collaborators or colleagues from the same institution. However, they can suggest potential peer reviewers in the cover letter. To verify the identity and expertise of suggested reviewers, the Editor may require their institutional email address and ORCID. Confidentiality should be maintained in all communications between Editors and peer reviewers, and reviewers should promptly disclose any conflicts of interest before accepting an invitation to review a manuscript. The Editor's decision regarding the selection of peer reviewers is final, although some requests for exclusion may be considered but are not guaranteed to be fulfilled.

Peer Reviewer Diversity

GALLA values diversity, equity, and inclusion in the peer review process. We encourage our Editors to select peer reviewers from diverse geographical regions, various backgrounds, and underrepresented groups. By promoting diversity, we aim to ensure a broad range of perspectives and expertise in evaluating submitted manuscripts. This approach enhances the quality, credibility, and inclusivity of our publications. We are committed to fostering an environment where all researchers feel valued and empowered. Together with our Editors and peer reviewers, we strive to maintain a fair and unbiased review process that upholds the highest standards of academic excellence and integrity. Thank you for joining us in our commitment to peer reviewer diversity.